Jones,
                I am a bit ashamed about waiting for these reports ( I waited 
for the cock to crow a 3rd time) but with corporate once you receive a "not 
ready to pursue this technology at the present time" Letter you don't want to 
risk crying wolf again unless you are convinced the evidence to outweigh some 
entrenched skeptics will be forthcoming.
Regards
Fran

From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 12:42 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:EETIMES publishes report

Ironic in a way, Fran ... (that you would hold back your enthusiasm now) but 
yes, the possibility of a 'very elaborate scam' involving dozens of 
participating strangers and doctorate-level scientists - has not been 
completely ruled out.

95% certainty is arguably "uncertain" to the strictly scientific mentality.

But it is ironic nevertheless ... since this device might well depend on the 
Casimir effect at the most fundamental level (not for the heat, per se, but for 
maintaining 'pycno' - dense hydrogen, following spillover).

If nothing else, your blog and posts have identified you as the chief proponent 
of the general idea that at least the first step in the anomalous heat 
processes, in many prior experiments, depends on cavity-QED.

Everything that follows would then depends a priori on the Casimir effect, even 
if it is "only" a force, and not a dynamic source of heat in itself. It is then 
clearly the most fundamental part of a two (or more) step process. And it is 
what LENR has lacked, until "nano" came along with Arata as the icon of that 
advance, since even Mills himself did not appreciate what was going-on in his 
similar experiments.

Few observers who have delved into this deeply doubt that Raney nickel provides 
the easiest commercial route to a massive level of Casimir cavities in nickel, 
nor that Rossi is using it as his "nano nickel" (nor that it is responsible for 
the two lab fires in New Hampshire)... nor even that that the many of the prior 
[problems with LENR stem from the fact that crystal 'dislocations' are a poor 
substitute for engineered cavities.

If the Casimir effect is NOT involved, I would be completely amazed.

If the Casimir effect is a sine qua non  to the reaction happening at a robust 
level, I would not be surprised in the least.

Hey ! Let's celebrate with a toast to Hendrik (Casimir) and especially to 
Murray (Raney)! who actually preceded Casimir by twenty years !! not to mention 
P&F and Rossi !!!

... maybe there should be martinis all around - which drink - BTW could be 
called the rossi ... if you want to get into a trivia contest <g> Bottom's up ! 
 and put it all on Park's tab.

Later, we can add a round for Mallove, Puthoff (ZPE) and even Mills, after we 
have had a few - and all the others who have pushed this along in their own way 
-Storms, Swartz, McKubre, Miley, Mizuno etc. etc. etc. not to mention Jed who 
has been the force majeure, so to speak - in the face of constant criticism 
from the meatheads of science.

Cheers,

Jones

From: francis

http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4212428/Italian-scientists-claim-cold-fusion-success

This is a widely read publication with a huge audience among government 
contractors. The major media will be next. To be honest I only forwarded my own 
comments with this news to certain peers at Lockheed this morning for fear of 
this being some elaborate hoax.

Reply via email to