On Feb 16, 2011, at 9:15 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from "22passi" blog interviewed again Andrea
Rossi on February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-
di.html
And this is an English translation courtesy of PESN, edited by Hank
Mills from a Google translation:
http://pesn.com/2011/02/14/9501766_Rossi_catalyzer_clarity_interview/
* * *
[snip]
ROSSI - In a nutshell for very nicely measuring the range of
radiation we should create a 360 degree hole in the reactor to
allow the meter to read what's happening there. But what that
implies is giving away the technology completely in the hands of a
person prepared to interpret the data. To design the systems
security anti spy technology of this kind is not enough to surround
himself with collaborators honest and like ... I myself, Andrea,
would be in crisis if someone were to say "we will give you a
figure that will change your life overnight and your next five
generations in return for telling us..." An offer of this kind
would severely test even the honesty of a Saint.
[snip]
--
Cheers,
S.A.
Independent evaluation of the commercial viability and utility of an
invention like this is typically made, and could have been made in
this case, by an independent third party, under a nondisclosure
agreement (NDA) before commercial financing is provided. Evaluation
of excess heat by calorimetry can even be accomplished free onsite by
using companies like Earthtech (www.earthtech.org).
Such an evaluation requires no obfuscation and minimal intervention
or constraints by the inventor during evaluation.
There have been many cases discussed here over the last 15 years of
bad or highly debatable calorimetry indicating total energy balances
beyond chemical. No one should invest a dime in any CF scheme for
business purposes unless expert calorimetry is performed in due
diligence.
Best regards,
Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
