On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> wrote:
<snip> > Independent evaluation of the commercial viability and utility of an > invention like this is typically made, and could have been made in this > case, by an independent third party, under a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) > before commercial financing is provided. Evaluation of excess heat by > calorimetry can even be accomplished free onsite by using companies like > Earthtech (www.earthtech.org). But Murray cross posted derogatory comments on the experiment here: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42393.html And the archives do not show all the recipients unlike my gmail archives: "from Rich Murray <rmfor...@gmail.com> reply-to vortex-l@eskimo.com to vortex-L@eskimo.com, michael barron <mhbar...@gmail.com>, Rich Murray <rmfor...@gmail.com>, Rich Murray <rmfor...@comcast.net>, "Sterling D. Allen" <sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com>, lit...@earthtech.org, mari...@earthtech.org, puth...@earthtech.org, joshua.c...@yahoo.com date Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:15 PM subject [Vo]:Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water, decisive critique by Joshua Cude: Rich Murray 2011.02.08 mailed-by eskimo.com unsubscribe Unsubscribe from this sender hide details Feb 8 (9 days ago) Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water, decisive critique by Joshua Cude: Rich Murray 2011.02.08" <snip> Which included members of Earthtech. When I suggested he include Earthtech in his retraction: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42488.html Rich did not respond, leaving Earthtech with a "bad taste in their mouth". Unethical, IMO. T
