On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:29 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > The natural isotope ratio of Cu63 to Cu65 is 2.235. The ratio that Rossi - > Focardi report in their paper is 1.6, which means that the ratio of Cu65 to Cu > 63 has *increased* beyond natural, implying a preference for the formation of > Cu > 65. This is strange because most Ni atoms are lighter than Cu63, so one might > reasonably expect that more Cu63 would form than Cu65, exaggerating the normal > predominance of Cu63. Instead, they claim the opposite has occurred.
Hmm, could it be that somehow Cu63 has captured a H2 molecule? T
