I love this group. It makes better viewing than a soap opera ;). Joe
On 19 Apr 2011, at 14:58, "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > This is hilarious and indicative of a child’s playground mentality … did so, > did not, did so … ROTFL > > > > – you said yourself, on the advice of your so-called expert, that the 130 kW > was BOGUS !! > > > > So now are you reversing direction once again, hoping to save face by using > the data you already rejected as evidence for something else that is > immaterial ! > > > > … or is it just sobbing in sandbox, because you are looking more foolish with > every inane posting? > > > > Jones > > > > From: Jed Rothwell > > > "Thus there is at least a 1000:1 error in that anecdotal appraisal, which is > not a surprise . . ." > > Furthermore, this is simple arithmetic. Input is 80 W, output 130,000. That's > a factor of 1,624. You claim it is 2 or 3. That's a factor of 800. > > > - Jed > >
