Jed Rothwell wrote:

>Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>>Whether or not the water flow is powered by the pump
>>or a waterfall, the kinetic energy of the flow may be a factor.
>
>No, it may not. That's out of the question. I have operated many flow 
>calorimeters of all sizes and types, and there is absolutely no way you can 
>detect the kinetic energy with this type of calorimeter. Furthermore, if you 
>could, they would see it when they turn on the flow and prepare to do 
>calorimetry, before they turn on the machine. The balance would be positive. 
>It 

>isn't.
>

I agree that the flow of water adds an insignificant of heat to the water.
I am speculating that a flow of water is part of the cold fusion "recipe" 
for making excess heat.

>
>>A lack of water movement may explain why some PF type cells failed to perform 
>>in 
>>
>>the past.They depended on the fickle nature of convection to spring to life.
>
> Not a chance.

why do you say that?

Harry


Reply via email to