Villa & Bianchini reports are available on-line.
V&B reports begin before the ignition.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jones Beene" <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 7:25 PM
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST?
Mattia,
Yes, but were either Villa or Bianchini setup to test along the axial
vector
(of the horizontal arm), and were they allowed to test at startup?
A hypothetical photon beam, if it was the source that Celani saw, would be
detectable only in that narrow beam emission vector - and nowhere else.
Jones, neither Villa nor Bianchini, with professional & calibrated
equipment, detected a burst in gamma radiation.
Celani instruments were away from e-cat (and we don't know if he used a
professional & calibrated detectors).
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jones Beene"
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST?
But Rossi did allow what Levi said was a positron detector during
operation... Apparently they expected to see positron annihilation.
One note on this, set against the reported Celani "rad-burst anecdote" at
the demo in Bologna:
If you remember the Celani story, both of his rad-meters got pegged
before
the demo, when a group was waiting to go in - from another room, and this
burst coincided with the reactor startup ... OK - the best explanation so
far was a coincidental cosmic ray burst... as odd as it sounds - here is
the
thread if you don't remember the incident:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg42665.html
For the record, there is one possibility that may not have been mentioned
before, involving positron annihilation - which can explain this. Of
course,
a coincidental cosmic ray burst cannot be ruled out, but we can weigh the
various probabilities of that happenstance against what will be suggested
below.
The evidence which we need to know would be this: was Celani standing in
alignment with the axis of horizontal arm of the E-Cat (in the other
room)
so that a directed beam from the axis of the E-Cat would have been aimed
directly at him? If not, then disregard what follows.
If he was positioned in axial alignment, even 10 meters away and behind a
wall or door - then we can suggest that positron annihilation could have
been involved in a situation where an axial magnetic field (caused by the
high amp heaters) would have aligned reactants for a directed beam.
Positron emission can occur with reactants that would have been used by
Rossi, including 40K. Most importantly, hydrogen fusing into deuterium
release a positron. A photon beam, as compared with a spherical burst
could
be thousands of times more intense in that axial vector only. A similar
thing happens in Cosmology when quasars emit in narrow beams.
Many observers are trying to weave the M.O. of the Rossi effect into the
Dirac "sea of negative energy" scenario and Don Hotson's epo
interpretation
of same. This beam scenario would fit into that - and the best part is
that
positron annihilation happens with two gammas going in opposite
directions,
so some kind of solenoid magnetic field in the reactor could have focused
an
intense beam of 512 keV gammas out of either end at startup. This also
explains why Levi's positron detector was not picking up anything. As you
can see in the video, the detector head is positioned orthogonal to the
axis, and the hypothetical beam, if it exists - would be axial...
Now, I have to ask again - where was Celani standing, relative to the
axis
of the reactor on startup? That could be the MAJOR clue that the subject
heading promises.
Jones
