Jones: Sorry of this is obvious, but… On page 8 of the consolidated report (2nd page of Bianchini's report) he shows that the neutron detector was positioned on the horizontal axis of the main tube… and it did take data before, during and after 'ignition'. I take it the neutron detector would not detect the photons that you were referring to?
-Mark >_____________________________________________ >From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] >Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 12:03 PM >To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >Subject: RE: [Vo]:Old, but MAJOR clue about the Rossi CATALYST? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mattia Rizzi > >> Villa & Bianchini reports are available on-line. > >It can be found here: >http://ebookbrowse.com/levi-bianchini-and-villa-reports-pdf-d62074366 > >The person who will probably most enjoy reading this, based on a theory of >operation is Fran >Roarty, if he has not already read it - since the conclusions of Villa & >Bianchini are unambiguous. > >THIS CANNOT BE A NUCLEAR REACTION > >However, I would add that they did NOT test in the axial vector; but aside >from that: > >"Assuming that the observed energy excess production rate (≈ 11 kW) is coming >from nuclear >reaction, knowing that a typical energy release is of the order of 1 MeV, it >is possible to >estimate the total fusion rate to be of the order of 7 · 10^16 reaction/s >(fusions or decays)" > >"This rate is so huge that there is no possibility for it to escape detection >provided that the γ have an energy above the 200 keV threshold." >Conclusions > >The main findings of the present study are the following: > >• the present reactor was actually able to vaporize a cold liquid water for >about 40 minutes, >showing a sizeable output-input power >difference and an integrated power production of several kWh; > >• no gamma radiation above the background level in the energy region >Eγ > 200 keV has been observed, neither in single counting, not in >Coincidence… > >• regardless of the internal details of the reaction chamber, shielding >and other industrial secrets, the γ rates measured with the NaI counters seem >not compatible with >the rates deduced or expected assuming >that the energy production was due to nuclear fusion or decay reactions…
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
