I believe the question is, What is canister D2 in the patent?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Angela Kemmler <angela.kemm...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Wed, 4 May 2011 13:48:37 +0300
>> Von: Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
>> An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Betreff: Re: [Vo]:What is the D2 Canister next to the H2 Canister
>
>> Dear Angela,
>> If you read the patent WO 2010/058288 (co-inventor is Piantelli's
>> daughter,
>> a physicist) and compare it with Rossi's patent you will see why the later
>> has problems.
>> Piantelli's patent has logical coherence- you can understand WHY you have
>> to
>> do what it describes.
>> Peter
>
>
> Yes Peter I read the patent about 2 month ago. The difference is that he has
> no secret catalyst. A patent must describe all the details an expert needs to
> replicate an effect and it must explain the "best method" available at the
> moment the patent request is made. I don't remember the details of the two
> Pantelli patents however. Was that your question? Regards, Angela
> --
> Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
> belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
>
>
