In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 23:35:44 -0400: Hi, [snip]
Actually, only a compound particle is required. It doesn't have to be negative (neutral would work too). >A compound negative particle is required to explain the production of many >elements in the Rossi ash besides Copper. > > > > > >8 - Oxygen > >9 - Fluorine(captured to form fluorides) > >10 - Neon (outgased ?) > >11 - Sodium > >12 - Magnesium > >13- Silicon (mentioned as ash) > >14 - Phosphorus > >15 Sulfur (mentioned as ash) > >16 Chlorine (mentioned as ash) > >17 Argon (outgased ?) > >18 Potassium (mentioned as ash) > >19 Calcium (mentioned as ash) > > > >A single proton will have only produced copper as stated by Rossi. > > >Kind regards, > >Axil > > >On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:06 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 13 May 2011 15:16:47 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >A muon is something that is massive and has a negative charge. By analogy, >> a >> >High-Rydburg(HR) state of hydrogen can build a compound virtual particle >> >that is very heavy and has a large negative charge. Because the group of >> >negative hydrogen ions is coherent, they behave as a single quantum >> >mechanical particle. I think a coherent cluster of hydrogen ions can build >> a >> >compound virtual particle that can catalyze fusion reactions just like a >> >muon can but only better. >> >> You don't need a compound particle for this. A single proton is already >> about 9 >> times more massive than a muon. >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
