On 2011-06-18 16:07, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today Rossi posted on his Blog some interesting info:
When E-Cats work without a drive, Rossi has to operate alone on them for
safety reasons. However Dr.Bianchini from the University of Bologna had
special permission to witness one on June 14th:
* * *
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360&cpage=21#comment-47097
June 19th, 2011 at 4:12 AM
Dear Italo A. Albanese:
Thank you for your insight: as you know, I cannot give information about
what happens inside the reactor.
To work without a drive is very dangerous, anyway, in my lab I am making
with a reactor 14 kWh/h without energu input, but, again it is very
dangerous. When I make this I have to be alone on the reactor, even if
on the 14th of june in Bologna I did this for about 1 hour at the
presence of Dr Bianchini, of the University of Bologna, asking him to
check the radiations outside the reactor: the Gieger I always work with
had an increase of emission, but it turned out that we were inside the
acceptable limits. Bu it is out of question that I can accept to use the
reactors this way in public or for the Customers. To be safe, totally
safe, we must have a drive and we must not exceed the factor of 6 (I
mean producing 6 rimes the energy consumed by the drive). Which is what
we guarantee to our Customers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
* * *
To tell the truth, I imagined that remote control and monitoring of
Energy Catalyzers working in potentially dangerous conditions in a safe
room would have been the norm. Or, at least, that's what I would do. In
motoring engineering that's what is usually done when stress testing or
setting up engines on a dynamometer test bed in controlled conditions.
Cheers,
S.A.
