>From Daniel: > My wife is a kind of medium. I don't believe that. > But, anyway, she doesn't know English and cannot read what I am > writing here, so, just ask Witch Doctor to tell her his true > name and I will email it to you > Steven, as a confirmation.
Let me repeat. The purpose of the Witch Doctor files was to simply place out in the public domain a possible alternative explanation as to what might be behind the Rossi Effect. I do not know if the "Witch Doctor" information is accurate data or not insofar as the Rossi Effect goes. The information nevertheless, struck me personally as being reasonably integrated. But this is both a subjective & interpreted conclusion on my part. In the final analysis I felt motivated to post edited transcripts in the hope that portions of the contents might possibly help certain scientist and researchers in their quest to acquire a better understanding of the Rossi Effect. It may have been a long shot on my part to have done so, but that's ok. Like many forms of risky "research" it remains to be seen if any of the transcript bears fruit. Daniel, in regards to you offer, I have a personal comment to make in regards to the unfortunate pedestals many of us are prone to occasionally generate in futile attempts to establish what we personally believe to be a "confirmation" of a mysterious source. To be honest we don't know, scientifically speaking, what this kind of source is or where it really comes from, so what's in a name? You might have skipped over my comment in Part 1 of 4 where I state that the "Witch Doctor" name I use is nothing more than a pseudo name given in order to protect the identity of the channeler, as well as the alleged name of the source. As for the actual name of the source... Confirming names tends to accomplish nothing more than confirming names. What's in a name other than brand name recognition. All that accomplishes is to build a sociological/political construct which individuals then feel obliged to either support or tear down. Is the "Witch Doctor" for real? In the final analysis the name given is no more real than the alleged name I had been given decades ago. It's been my experience that "Brand Name Recognition" accomplishes little insofar as learning the art of personally assessing the value of the information itself. Either the information is useful or it isn't, and that remains to be seen. Hope this clarifies any brand name misconceptions. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
