"Vanished, forever" what do you mean, Stephen?

Seems to me we simply don't have enough facts to make conclusive
judgments about the Rossi affair either way.

Skeptics will simply point to the unaccounted-for or "sold" factory
statement as yet another long string of convenient deflections made by
Rossi that seem to obfuscate the authenticity of his ecat claims.

Believers, on the other hand, will simply accept the fact that Rossi
sold the factory because he needed cash to help further fund his work.
At least that's what Rossi has said.

Both are reasonable conclusions depending on one's personal predilections.

FWIW, seems to me that if I were in Rossi's shoes and I was still
attempting to get a number of patents filed I would not be terribly
thrilled about the prospects of publicly revealing the location of a
former factory where one of my eCat prototypes was allegedly
operational for about a year. I'd suspect that there would have been a
number of employees in the factory who were aware of the uniqueness of
the contraption. A few of them might have subsequently acquired
first-hand knowledge of how the ecat device actually works, as well as
what the basic ingredients are that make up the mysterious catalyst.
Under the circumstances, if I were Rossi, I would deflect like crazy.
I'd worry about a persistent competitor or reporter locating the
factory where a couple of conveniently placed bribes here and there
might be just enough to learn the secrets.

If I were Rossi, I'd play dumb. (It seems to be a useful skill that he
has acquired.) Let the skeptics help generate all the obfuscation
Rossi needs in order to help keep opportunists from snooping about.

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks

Reply via email to