Obviously I meant to write:

. . . you can feel the OUTLET is substantially warmer than the INLET. . . .

I meant in the 18-hour test with flowing liquid water. As described here:

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece

. . . the inlet was tap-water temperature, around 15°C and the outlet was
around 20°C for most of the test, and for a while it was 40°C. It is very
easy to confirm that these temperature difference are real, and not an
instrument artifact or caused by fake instruments. Of course you cannot tell
if the outlet is 35°C or 45°C, but you can tell it is much warmer than the
inlet, and the input power would only make it a fraction of a degree warmer.

People who imagine it is impossible to visually confirm that the flow rate
is about 1 L/s, and not -- say -- 10 times less or 100 times less have no
experience doing experiments, plumbing, or working with ornamental ponds.

- Jed

Reply via email to