To be fair, in this report
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf
Rossi and Focardi describe some other water flow tests on page 3.
 
Harry

From: Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 3:08:17 PM
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Levi's likely attitude
>
>
>In this case there is only one problem/question. 1L per second i.e. 15.65 gpm 
>is an incredibly high flow for a tap
>and for the water feeding tubes. Perhaps a garden hose
>could do it. It seems it was a surprise- the 130kW heat peak and this was 
>quenched with the maximum available flow. 
>No flowmeter was installed.
>Anyway I have performed many industrial tests/experiment
>in the chemical industry and we had an axiomatic saying-
>1 test is no test, 1 result is no result. Why all the other teste were 
>performed with water to steam? And why the enthalpy of the steam was not 
>measured? 
>Peter
>
>
>On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Obviously I meant to write:
>>
>>
>>. . . you can feel the OUTLET is substantially warmer than the INLET. . . .
>>
>>
>>I meant in the 18-hour test with flowing liquid water. As described here: 
>>
>>
>>http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3108242.ece
>>
>>
>>. . . the inlet was tap-water temperature, around 15°C and the outlet was 
>>around 20°C for most of the test, and for a while it was 40°C. It is very 
>>easy to confirm that these temperature difference are real, and not an 
>>instrument artifact or caused by fake instruments. Of course you cannot tell 
>>if the outlet is 35°C or 45°C, but you can tell it is much warmer than the 
>>inlet, and the input power would only make it a fraction of a degree warmer. 
>>
>>
>>People who imagine it is impossible to visually confirm that the flow rate is 
>>about 1 L/s, and not -- say -- 10 times less or 100 times less have no 
>>experience doing experiments, plumbing, or working with ornamental ponds. 
>>
>>- Jed
>>
>> 
>
>
>-- 
>Dr. Peter Gluck
>Cluj, Romania
>http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
> 
>
>

Reply via email to