Peter, As far as I can see Naudin has never tried an experiment that did not work for him.
His MAHG power measurements are in error (which has been pointed out to him). His write ups are beautifully presented but in my opinion generally unreliable. Ron --On Sunday, September 18, 2011 10:01 AM +0200 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm I think, this is easy to debunk. They say, they have a toroidal magnet. An ideal toroidal magnet has no external field and so there can be no back electromagnetic force. Now this is untrue. In this magical moment, where the permanent magnet passes by at the toroidal magnet, the ferrite core is momentary driven into saturation. Because -obviously- the total magnetic field is not toroidal -in this magic moment-, the saturation will not be toroidal. The saturation will be strong where the magnetic field is strong. Obviously the magnetic field is strongest near to the permanent magnet. So, -in this magic moment- the ferrite core is saturated near to the permanent magnet and is less saturated at the opposite side of the toroidal core. Therefore -in this magic moment- we have a situation where the toroid looks like a toroid, but it doesnt work like a toroid. In this magic moment the toroid will act like an electro-horseshoe magnet. and we get a back-emf for a short moment. I think this is easy to understand and to debunk. Im disappointed that Naudin apparently tries to support this rubbish instead debunking it and this makes me very critical about his other experiments. Can he be trusted? He supports and tries all kinds of obvious crap experiments. Possibly he does it for money, creating faked overunity orgasms for his undisclosed customers. Of course, I cannot accuse him that. Maybe he does it just for fun ;-) Best, Peter
