RF cavity is used in particle accelerators. Those things are AC yet they dissipate very little, if I recall correctly a stationary RF in one of those lasts for months. They spend more energy for keeping things cool.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_Radio_Frequency mic 2011/10/19 Higgins Bob-CBH003 <bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com>: > Say that initially the superconductor was brought into its SC state not in > the presence of magnetic fields. At that time there are nominally no > supercurrents. As you bring the SC into the presence of a magnet a > supercurrent must form that previously did not exist to prevent penetration > of the magnetic field into the superconductor. This is not a DC > supercurrent because it has not existed in steady state for all time. > Initially there will be some loss in the supercurrent because there are > components that are not DC. At least that’s my understanding. I asked a > guy at CERN about this in how they bring up their strong supercurrent in > their superconducting electromagnets. It is not a simple process. > > ________________________________ > > From: Wm. Scott Smith [mailto:scott...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 4:28 PM > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:S-C currents not DC? > > > > How are S-C currents not DC? > > ________________________________ > > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation > From: fznidar...@aol.com > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:19:59 -0400 > > thanks for the info > > -----Original Message----- > From: Higgins Bob-CBH003 <bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 8:48 am > Subject: RE: [Vo]:quantum levitation > > Note that superconductors have zero resistance only for DC. At all > frequencies > > above DC, the resistance is finite and there is penetration. Consider also > that > > true DC extends from time -infinity to +infinity as a constant. Moving the > > superconductor in a magnetic field does create resistance because the > > supercurrents are not DC. > > > > Bob Higgins > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:27 PM > > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation > > > > Is it posible the RF signal is warming the superconductor just above > > the critical temperature so that it drops? > > > > > > Harry > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:48 PM, <fznidar...@aol.com> wrote: > >> A new understanding of flux pinning is the most important relation in 100 > >> years. The magnet floats on the superconductor. Apply an RF field of 10 > >> mega hertz to a small disk and the magnet drops. That what I saw, so >> what > >> you say. Now we know how energy is released. Energy is pinned with the > >> atom by the same mechanism, discontinuities. Where are >> the discontinuities > >> in the atom, here there are below. > >> >> http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/10710753/the-elastic-limit-of-space-and-the-quantum-condition > >> What can you predict knowing the observed release condition? Try the >> energy > >> levels of the hydrogen atom, the intensity of spectral emission, > >> the distribution of electrons in the atom, and the frequency and energy of > >> the photon. see below > >> >> http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Publication/10755558/the-control-of-the-natural-forces > >> If you are so bright, where is your peer reviewed paper. Here it is >> below. > >> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389211006092 > >> > >> An understating of flux pinning and flux release has the potential > >> to transform the study of physics and our society. That my story > >> and I am sticking to it, no matter what Jones says. > >> Frank Znidarsic > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: fznidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> > >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > >> Sent: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 7:20 pm > >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation > >> > >> > >> All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted > >> by the basic laws of electrical induction and the zero resistivity offered > >> by a superconductor, you would expect repulsion or attraction to occur. > >> > >> No it is not. This flux pinning thing is a big deal. The same mechanism > >> accounts for the pinning of flux in a superconductor accounts for the >> energy > >> levels of the atom. > >> A solution that includes both provides for a classical foundation for > >> quantum physics. > >> Flux is pinned in the nucleus too. An understanding of the > >> release mechanism provides for a new understanding of the cold fusion > >> reaction. > >> Flux is pinned at discontinuities. It is shook free by a vibration at a > >> dimensional frequency of 1,094,000 meters/second. Thats it. > >> I did the experiment with the superconductor, Horace now has it. > >> > >> > >> Frank Znidarsic > >> > >> > >
