Hello Fran, I don`t understand your statement: Now that Mills admits the “hydrino” is actually fractiona Rydberg hydrogen the term hydrino not only becomes redundant but also carries all the baggage of his previously wrong definition that caused so much controversy. I thought Mills has always said that the hydrino = hydrogen in a fractional quantum state.
BTW the continuum spectrum in discharges of H2 gas is 100% reproducible and has no known explanation. Peter van Noorden ----- Original Message ----- From: Roarty, Francis X To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 6:40 PM Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as fractional Rydberg That is exactly what I was saying… Now that Mills admits the “hydrino” is actually fractiona Rydberg hydrogen the term hydrino not only becomes redundant but also carries all the baggage of his previously wrong definition that caused so much controversy. The term should be eradicated with extreme predjudice. From: Danny Ross Lunsford [mailto:antimatte...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:28 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as fractional Rydberg You can forget the hydrino. It does no good to adhere to bad ideas. Angular momentum conservation prevents it. We need to use good physics to get to the bottom of this phenomenon, and ruthlessly eliminate the bad ideas. ---------------------------------------------- "I write a little. I erase a lot." - Chopin --- On Tue, 11/1/11, Roarty, Francis X <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: A recent paper “Time-resolved hydrino continuum transitions with cutoffs at 22.8 nm and 10.1 nm” http://www.springerlink.com/content/q8005267210x3568/fulltext.pdf...
