Dave,
                I think you have an underlying misconception. It isn't thermal 
energy that is being exploited, catalytic energy is related to Casimir geometry 
which in the case of nanotubes only occurs at openings and defects in the 
nanotube as recently discovered by Peng Chen at Cornell using an AFM. This 
establishes a relationship between catalytic action and change in Casimir force 
- geometry. It is a difference in vacuum energy density not temperature that 
feeds the reaction so you are not exhausting a thermal reservoir. IMHO this is 
why gas is a necessary part of the equation since relative motion of gas to the 
Casimir geometry is maintained by HUP. This is the same source of energy that 
keeps gas from becoming solid at absolute zero.. hence can be referred to as 
Zero Point Energy. The similarity between skeletal catalysts and the Casimir 
geometry of nano powders also supports this relationship.

                Within the context of the above relationship there can be no 
hydrino without Casimir geometry, as the hydrino or IRH diffuses out of the 
catalyst or nano powder it simply translates back to normal hydrogen. There 
would therefore  be no hydrinos floating freely in the atmosphere and it 
remains an open question if di-hydrinos are even possible much less if their 
covalent bond could hold the hydrino in this catalyzed state outside of the 
catalyst.  If Jan Naudts is correct about the hydrino / IRH being relativistic 
then one could say the hydrino only exists from a relativistic perspective and 
locally appears just like normal hydrogen. Most would say this kind of time 
dilation or equivalent acceleration is impossible in the confines of a bulk 
material sitting in a lab but we are conditioned to think in terms of a 
Pythagorean relationship with C to solve for gamma and I think suppression side 
steps this issue. Suppression reduces energy density instead of increasing it 
and instead of equivalent acceleration it affords equivalent de-acceleration.
Regards

Fran

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:37 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as 
fractional Rydberg

Thank you for the response.  The hydrino cycle that I am describing, aka heat 
pump of some unusual type, would allow energy contained within the thermal 
surroundings to do work.  I can imagine some of that work being used to 
generate radiant energy that could then escape the system.  This escaping 
energy would cause the local system to cool off.  This technique sounds a lot 
like a violation of the laws of thermodynamics.  I guess that a similar process 
occurs when a dust cloud  cools down by radiating heat energy.   Is there any 
way that we can verify that a process exists which will enable the hydrinos to 
absorb the hypothetical energy you discussed and emerge as hydrogen again?

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 3:35 pm
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as 
fractional Rydberg

In reply to  David Roberson's message of Wed, 2 Nov 2011 09:12:47 -0400 (EDT):

Hi,

[snip]

>

>That is the question that I would like to have answered.  Would the hydrino be

able to acquire the needed energy from the thermal energy available of the

atmosphere?  If not, why have not all of the hydrogen atoms in existence (on

earth) been catalyzed during the eons of time that has been available?



Because in order to be catalyzed, they need to exist as individual atoms,

whereas all the Hydrogen on Earth exists bound in chemical compounds.

Furthermore even when present as an atom, it still needs to come across a

catalyst atom too.



>My main purpose for asking the question is to determine if some type of heat

pump could be used where hydrogen is turned into hydrinos releasing heat and

then released.  Then I was hoping that they would reacquire the energy from the

thermal environment to be recycled.  This sounds like a breech of the second

law, but why not give it a try. :-)

>

>Dave

I don't think so, though perhaps solar x-rays in the upper atmosphere might

reconstitute them.



Regards,



Robin van Spaandonk



http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html


Reply via email to