Hi Peter, In every test there's been something missing. Why?
Colin On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > Yes this is true. > It was a quick idea that I had during work and posted during work without > much consideration. > > Rossi should have released the steam into the air after the testing was > finished. This would give 300 liter of dry steam per second but in air up > in the sky it will condense and should look impressive. > > Even better: If he had used this 105 degree steam to heat water in a > secondary vessel with a heatexchanger, and let the water evaporate into the > sky, this would look impressive and it would be hard if not impossible to > have any doubts about the steam quality and energy. Worldwide attention > would have been guaranteed, especially if then police and fire brigades > come and stop the experiment. ;-) > > Peter > > > ----- Original Nachricht ---- > Von: Colin Hercus <colinher...@gmail.com> > An: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43 > Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations > > > Hi Peter, > > > > It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the heat > > dissipater and they'd need a pretty good pump to get a vacuum. > > > > Colin > > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:17 PM, <peter.heck...@arcor.de> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I recalculated the pipe diameter needed for the 1MW plant. > > > There is an important consideration that might have been missed by > many: > > > > > > If all steam is condensed in the heatdissipator then we cannot assume > air > > > pressure at the other end of the pipe. > > > In this case we must assume almost vacuum at the other side. > > > > > > If this is considered, we cannot use a steam pipe calculation for 1 > bar. > > > We must assume 2 bar for the pressure difference. > > > So Rossis statement, almost airpressure at this point, where the > > > temperature was measured, could be true. > > > Also a inner pipe diameter of about 8.5 cm (as I have measured) could > > work > > > in this case. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > >
