Jed, i'm still waiting to know why an expert of thermodynamic, hired for checking a 2,000,000$ trade, would: 1) Mesaure the energy by measuring the liquid water condensed and then calculate the energy by the ASSUMPTION that the remaining water has been converted into a dry steam, when there are more realible systems. 2) Why this expert didn't add a Demister or even a symple water trap (do you know what is? it's a U shaped tube with an exit on the bottom) to make *sure* that all the water condensed will exit and go inside the water tank and measure it. The point 2 is CRITICAL when the measuremnt is done with point 1, because without using a demister you made a mesuremnt error that *over-extimate* the real energy produced. And if you don't event add a simply water trap, the method 1 is simple *non-sense* because much of the water woldn't exit to the water tank. I cannot believe, and you must agree, that an expert would do a so much flawed test for a TWO MILLION OF DOLLARS trade.
2011/11/3 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> > Am 03.11.2011 23:45, schrieb Jed Rothwell: > > Peter Heckert wrote: >> >> What do you think why did he invite an AP journalist who has no >>> technical or scientific knowledge? >>> >> >> Who told you this journalist has no technical or scientific knowledge? >> Did you communicate with the journalist? Where did you get this information? >> >> Please do not make assertions about this journalist if you do not know >> who he is or how much he knows. >> >> Instinct. > Clearvoyance. > Test what I say and prove me false. > Show me sciene articles that he published. > >
