> Vorl Bek wrote: > > >> This is what Rossi has said on many occasions. He says he > >> cannot leave the thing, especially in self-sustaining mode.
> > The idea that Rossi would do an unconvincing demo because he > > needed to empty his bladder or get some sleep, and could not > > delegate control for a while, makes little sense. > > Indeed, that makes no sense at all. But what you are describing > did not happen. Rossi did a convincing demo. He stopped because > he and the observers needed to get some sleep. That's what Lewan > and the others told me. The demo that Nelson saw was not convincing, at least to Nelson: > According > to Nelson, a NASA engineer who investigates low-energy nuclear > reactions and space applications, Rossi did not run his > demonstration long enough to prove his extraordinary claim. Nelson wanted to see a longer demo. Apparently he would have been able to do without sleep, or would have stood shifts with a colleague. Presumably, Rossi, who wants to make money, knew that the observer, or one of the observers, was a NASA engineer. To do a demo for somebody like Nelson, who, if convinced, might run back to Washington and recommend that his bosses spend a couple of million to get hold of the amazing device, it seems like human nature to put on the best show possible, but Rossi could not be bothered. Strange.