On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:52 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> > I made a good faith effort to explain the system to one of them to no > avail. That particular one refused to discuss the operation of Rossi's 1 > MW system in details point by point. > It is apparent that he realized that his argument was being dismissed and > ran for cover. Maybe he was afraid that he would have to accept the fact > that Rossi's test was valid > once his misconceptions were revealed. > You've got this exactly reversed. I replied to your last post point by point, and *you* ignored the arguments, possibly fearing you would have to accept that the evidence did not support Rossi's claims.
