maybe is it still legal to build a similar reactor, with a pattented, or in process of patent, technology, but you have to obtain the allowance of the inventor/owner... and not steal it.
normally rossi before applying for patent, should have put a document in a third-party file, that proove that he know the technology before. (in france, you store a closed letter at INPI, as proof of priority in case of debate) I hope also that once the patent application start, it should also block posterious similar patent to be applied if Defkalion simply have retro-engineered, or reinvented from rumors, the same device... and then have simply worked hard to make it industrial, efficient, stable... then they just have to say, "hey andrea, what is your price? or howmuch you pay for our engineering job ? with careful respect of course..." they simply cannot force the patent owner to sell or buy... they will need good diplomacy (maybe Professor Chris Stremmenos could make it ?) 2011/11/29 <peter.heck...@arcor.de> > If it is true, then it is a case of scientific fraud and industrial > spionage. > If its untrue and they all collaborate behind the scenes, then ist is a > gigantic staged investment fraud. > In both cases it is a case for Interpol. > > For now I think they are all gangsters working together behind the scenes > until something else is proven. > This case could have been avoided. > Rossi could easily claim priority if he had done a conclusive irrefutable > calorimetry test, e.g. a realworld heating application that was measured by > scientists and trustable witnesses. He had serious proposals and offers > enough. > > Peter >
