Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote: But you're not proposing a solution within a moral framework. You're > advocating that people take money from those who may not want to give > it . . .
In that case it should come from a temporary tax on the sale of cold fusion devices. A royalty, in other words. Taxation is theft because it sits outside of any moral framework . . . I do not think so but that is beyond the scope of the discussion. Wrong forum. > I fully support their claims to intellectual property, but that's where > the battle should be fought. > It has been fought and lost there already, thanks to the U.S.P.O., the DoE and others. Experts tell me it is too late for anyone to get a patent for cold fusion, probably including Rossi. Some other equitable and pragmatic solution should be found. - Jed
