Am 01.12.2011 19:19, schrieb Joshua Cude:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com
<mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It's easy to "dope" a device with a gamma emitter to
fake a result but the test should involve the gamma source turning on
and off with the E-cat power. That can be spoofed too but it's more
difficult to do.
Putting in a gamma source is easy. Putting one in that could account
for the 10 kW of power? Not so easy. This would correspond to
megacuries, or at least hundreds of kCi. That's 1000 times more
radioactive than the sources in devices used for radiotherapy, and
unshielded, they are extremely dangerous. (Laboratory sources are
typically measured in microcuries.) There is no way, as Villa pointed
out in his January report, such a source could have been missed. He
measured radiation through holes in the shielding, and found none, and
said: "Even assuming that the whole horizontal tube is made of lead
(10 cm radius), we expected some γ to pass." Thermal energy from
gammas does not make any sense.
It is interesting to see in Defkalion's spec sheet on page 2, they have
a 3mm thick layer around their box, named "gamma isolation". I asked
about this in their forum, but no answer yet.
The box contains a vacuum, so this layer cannot been meant for heat
transfer to the fluid medium.
Apparently they dont claim gamma thermalization. Another poster asked
about this and they anwered "something else and different".
Peter
