We do have a language barrier here... sorry! Can someone translate my point to Peter?
"If I understand you right, you don't want anything being tested this way. And Rossi does not want it. This is strange. No, that is NOT what I meant... I think your analysis was a GOOD effort! -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Peter Heckert [mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 2:10 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:The 6 Oct Rossi test heat exchanger model Am 11.12.2011 22:57, schrieb Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint: > Peter: > There's a bit of a language barrier here... > > I was not suggesting that you actually repeat the analysis, or do something a > little different... but I think most readers will understand my point. I dont understand your point. If I could test the ecat I would do it in the same way. If it works I would confirm it. If it does not work I would not confirm it. This is what I did with the heatexchanger software, inside the frame of my possibilities. If I understand you right, you dont want anything being tested this way. And Rossi does not want it. This is strange. At some day, however, it must happen. Peter
