I'm sorry if this has been discussed before. What I find odd about Newan's documentation is that he notes the boiling point at 99.5 C. He then adds .5 C to that on page two when explaining the outlet under approximately 200 mm or so of water. So he gets 100 C overall and a measured T out of slightly above 100 C - which would result in steam if we assume that the hose itself plus the valve its connected to don't need any pressure to let the steam pass through. However on April 28 pressure in Bologna was recorded at 1012 hPa throughout most of the afternoon which would lead to a boiling point of 100 C for pure water - not 99.5 C. However with a boiling point of 100 C and the outlet 200 mm under water the measured temperatures could not lead to boiling, let alone vaporization.
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test... Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Yamali Yamali
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Jouni Valkonen
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 201... Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April... Robert Leguillon
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Joshua Cude
- Re: [Vo]:Reviewing Lewan's test of April 2011 Yamali Yamali