Maybe I'm missing something but it is not claimed over and over that LENR are tabletop experiments that are achieved with relatively simple equipment? Is not the incredible interest in LENR by supporters due to the fact that it could change energy production in such way that every household could have a relatively small machine that could supply all the energetic needs of a house? Is not this what is claimed at least for the Rossi's type of LENR?
Then it is self evident that everybody could reproduce the results at home. I don't see what is crazy about this statement. Giovanni On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> Iron has 10 times lower specific heat than water. It would store less >> heat, not more. It could not be heated more than a few hundred degrees with >> this equipment, so total heat storage would be less than it would with a >> pot of water. >> > > Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves > in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good > reason? > >
