Mary Yugo <maryyu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Am I to assume you examined the mathematical modeling and resulting curves
> in the links I provided and have analyzed and rejected them for some good
> reason?
>

Yes. I have seen blacksmiths at work. I have seen one heat a large chunk of
iron, as big as the reactor core, to red hot incandescence. This is hotter
than an electric heater could make the core. The iron is dunked into a
bucket of water. This produces a cloud of steam, and then rapid boiling for
a minute or two. It does not cause the bucket of water to boil for four
hours. There is no conceivable way to store that much heat in this much
iron.

You can verify that with a small-scale experiment. Try heating a nail and
putting it in water.

I seriously suggest people should try this. Why not? a skeptic who
sincerely believes it is possible to achieve this effect by conventional
means should do some simple tests to confirm that.

Evidently the mathematical modeling is wrong. I do not have to determine
the details when it is obvious the conclusions conflict with everyday
experience and fundamental observational physics to this extent. If someone
makes a mathematical model showing that I can jump over the Empire State
building I do not need to prove it is wrong.

Note that "Rossi" means "Smith." Perhaps he comes from a long line of
blacksmiths. He has the kind of intuitive skills that a good blacksmith has.

People have been working with hot iron for thousands of years. They know
how it works. I know how it works. All the skeptical hypotheses that
attempt to explain these test contradict knowledge going back hundreds of
thousands of years.

- Jed

Reply via email to