Phase II of his theory. The eigenvalue radius of the ground state dynamically shrinks due to the screening of protons and electrons. It just happen with a very specific tetrahedron configuration of protons/deuterons and electrons.
2011/12/30 Charles Hope <lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com> > What is Takahashi analogue to the deflated electron? > > > > On Dec 30, 2011, at 13:21, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Your theory is just too similar to what I imagine that should happen in > Phase III that I get confused. You are correct in your stuff, but you don't > use many equations, mostly your intuition. So, I get lost reading your > papers. > > Right, to be clear. a-e. Just show me where I can find in your papers. I > will surely read it, because I just could start to figure out anything from > you only when I had a similar idea. > > 2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> > >> What part do you not understand: >> >> a. the mechanism of trapping of the post fusion nuclear electron >> b. the low energy state of the post fusion nuclear electron >> c. the mechanism by which the trapped electron absorbs the fusion >> energy >> d. why the fusion energy is not sufficient to eject the post fusion >> nuclear electron >> e. the ability of the post fusion trapped nuclear electron to radiate >> >> Just to be clear, I am talking about my theory here, deflation fusion, >> not any other. I think these things have been described in my articles, but >> often when I look back I find material that was posted but not included in >> any article, but which I had assumed was included in an article. >> Sometimes it takes me months to find things, and in the interim I think >> maybe they were figments of my imagination. >> >> >> On Dec 30, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: >> >> I didn't understand this part "from the intermediate nucleus vicinity in >> small increments by a trapped electron." >> >> 2011/12/30 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> >> >>> >>> On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:21 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: >>> >>> Oh, nice! That's why he also congratulated you in that report. I didn't >>> go to the talk or take part in the CMNS list, so I cannot know. I am happy >>> that I got to similar conclusions as you did independently. Several people >>> reaching the same conclusions, in similar ways, is a sign of things going >>> into the right direction. >>> >>> But I am still not sure how to get rid of the gamma rays. >>> >>> >>> You don't have to worry about big gammas if there are none produced. >>> You don't have to worry about getting rid of gamma rays if they are >>> released from the intermediate nucleus vicinity in small increments by a >>> trapped electron. >>> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Horace Heffner >> http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
