I agree with you Fran. It seems that in historical perspective Rossi's sudden divorce from Defkalion instead of constructive discussions and compromises was a great and costly error. Peter
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Peter,**** > > Rossi is already one of many – the new researchers that we > hear about here on Vortex are less than the tip of the iceberg. I wish > Rossi well but seriously doubt he will even get his own investment back out > without a patent. He is probably too old and poor to survive the years of > litigation it would take to recover anything from his intellectual property > – Especially since new physics must first be proven before any explanation > Rossi currently has could be patentable. I honestly believe we are only a > single breakthrough away from this technology being proven by experiment > rathe r than theory. I would put Mills, Moller and Rossi all in the same > boat of having self destructive product – the more OU they demonstrate the > more damage the geometry sustains making repeatability difficult unless you > use new powder every time. Defkallion talk of modifying the reactor > geometry and spreading out the reaction does sound like a logical way to > mitigate the self destruction – I don’t think it will eliminate it but > could increase repeatability enough to finally prove by experiment that > this is for real. **** > > Regards**** > > Fran**** > > ** ** > < p class=MsoNormal>*From:* Peter Gluck [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 11, 2012 2:25 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Ecat production will be robotized...**** > > ** ** > > Rossi's compettion will multiply, prosper and deliver**** > > certainties. Rossi will become one of many.**** > > Peter**** > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > > > On 12-01-11 08:57 AM, Wolf Fischer wrote: **** > > Hi all,**** > > Rossi made the following statement on his journal:**** > > * * > > *January 10th, 2012 at 4:05 PM* > > *[ ... ] ready to make order confirmations in Autumn; [ ... ] first > deliveries will start perhaps within the year, but I cannot promise it [ > ... ]***** > > > I assume everyone here picked up on the significance of this, right? > > Applying the usual "delivery date estimate deflater" which is required in > any industry, this means we should expect first deliveries no earlier than > *2013*. > > Until then, whether you "believe" or not, if you want to know for sure if > this is real, you will just have to wait and see. Until first deliveries > happen (or don't happen) *n othing* is going to be conclusive. (Oh, the > believers will think it's all conclusively positive, the skeptics will > think it's all conclusively negative, but there surely won't be anything > conclusive enough to move a fence-sitter to one side or the other.) > > * > My prediction*: This is going to be a long, boring year on Vortex with > almost all discussion preempted by interminable chewing over of the bits > and pieces of rumors and questionable facts surrounding Rossi.**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck**** > > Cluj, Romania**** > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com**** > > ** ** > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
