That's not from NASA. It's a hobby work that was elected photo of the day. This is the v2, the v1 of this zoom was much worse.
As for proving and disproving anything. Beware of the statistics. You can fit things with several curves, not only the bell curve. In fact, in the natural world, the distribution curves are rarely gaussian away from the peak, that is, with unusual structures. 2012/3/14 Jones Beene <[email protected]> > This NASA zoom view, despite the cheesy artwork, is a good segue to one > of the most fascinating alternative theories to the big bang. **** > > ** ** > > This emerging new outlook requires some version of a “multi-verse,” which > can be a succession of “little bangs” or array of parallel universes which > replace a single universe, and a single creation event. In short, there is > firm evidence out there from recent surveys that the big bang theory is not > tenable. Red-shifts have always been explainable in other ways.**** > > ** ** > > When you get to near the end of the NASA zoom, there are two notable > features – “great walls” and a structure called simply the “cold spot” > which is more than a structure (or less depending on semantics) since it > absolutely disproves the current cosmological model. It is a hole which is > a billion light years across, lies in the constellation Eridanus and > consists of nothing - a statistically impossible depletion of matter; and > this “lack of” anything is beyond the traditional understanding of big bang > cosmology. **** > > ** ** > > This hole is also known as “great void” or CMB cold spot.**** > > ** ** > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WMAP_cold_spot**** > > ** ** > > The best explanation so far for what could cause such a gaping hole: "It > is the unmistakable imprint of another universe beyond the edge of our > own," says Laura Mersini-Houghton of the University of North Carolina at > Chapel Hill. She has made other predictions which are being confirmed, for > this hypothesis.**** > > ** ** > > Heaven forbid that mainstream fizzix is wrong once again, but I think this > “tar heel” has got it right. **** > > ** ** > > There are also a few “far out” implications for alternative energy, > believe it or not – especially in the Southern Hemisphere.**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Terry Blanton **** > > ** ** > > From the Planck Length to the Universe with interactive zoom:**** > > ** ** > > http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120312.html **** > > ** ** > > T**** > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
