The idea was doing something cheap, right? 2012/4/5 <fznidar...@aol.com>
> Why not use a carbon dioxide laser? > > At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >The problem would be the output. The low energy > >tail would have also a very low power. I think a > >specialized equipment for that band is required... > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Thu, Apr 5, 2012 7:17 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulation of LENR using dual lasers, creative > engineering needed > > At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: > >The problem would be the output. The low energy > >tail would have also a very low power. I think a > >specialized equipment for that band is required... > > > >2012/4/5 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > > > >Hey Daniel – instead of straight wide spectrum > >low IR - why not add a special filter to a tuned > >resistance heater electrode to get some kind of > >pseudo coherence? Here is a pretty steep spike at 2 THz: > > Yeah, I think Daniel is right. This is why dual > laser stimulation is being used. It's relatively > cheap. It's also low yield, but probably not as > low as relying on a thermal source with a filter. > And it's coherent, which might be necessary. > > I may suggest using a non-laser diode plus a > tunable laser to generate the frequencies, to see > if coherence is necessary.... Any ideas? > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
