The long term accumulation and concentration of electrostatic charge (1,000 to 2,000 electrons) is one major cause of cold fusion. Phonon resonance may produce this accumulation and concentration but it is not the only cause. Charge may accumulate near the interface bounderies of two metals as setup and used by ahern.
This ahern cause many be rooted in the formation of ion crystals like a Arata, Mills and Rossi. On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, the cause of CF is probably not phonon resonance. Otherwise, how > could small grains used by ahern, with around 1000 atoms could produce > heat? Or maybe, that's a reason why phonon resonance works better with such > small clusters? Such small particles tend to organize > themselves, spontaneously, in regular polyhedra, to maximize > the energy binding of the grain. > > > 2012/4/6 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > >> To the highest possible extent, the lattice should be devoid of flaws to >> minimize random phonon reflections(RPR). RPR will disrupt the phonon >> resonance pattern that the lattice heat stimulant is producing. A flawed >> lattice could be the reason for inconsistent results in many experiments. >> >> Obviously, micro powder will not work in this type of phonon system which >> seeks to establish a phonon resonance pattern. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> That is another alternative, though, why not heat it with ultrasound? >>> BTW, does the experimenters take care in figuring how the material was >>> produced in relation to its lattice structure? Maybe the experiments do >>> not go right so frequently because they rely on stimulate the lattice in >>> specific directions and, because of this, they end up being randomly >>> successful... >>> >>> 2012/4/6 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> >>> >>>> However, I'm not clear if the far infrared would penetrate the windows >>>> and electrolyte. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2012/4/5 >>>> <<mailto:fznidar...@aol.com>fz**nidar...@aol.com<fznidar...@aol.com> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Why not use a carbon dioxide laser? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At 04:05 PM 4/5/2012, Daniel Rocha wrote: >>>>> >The problem would be the output. The low energy >>>>> >tail would have also a very low power. I think a >>>>> >specialized equipment for that band is required... >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> danieldi...@gmail.com >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com > >
