http://rulev-igor.narod.ru/theme_142.html

11.05.2012, 21:39, "Jojo Jaro" <jth...@hotmail.com>:
> Having 2 spark plugs on both ends, and firing them alternately in groups will 
> cause the hot zone to alternate between the 2 ends.  This to me would push 
> the hydrogen back and forth between the 2 ends, as hot hydrogen expands and 
> migrate to the cool end.  Timing the sparks properly would create a constant 
> hot hydrogen gas pulse alternating between the 2 ends.  And fast flowing 
> hydrogen should carry the nickel nanopowder along for the ride thereby 
> ensuring that the sparks never hit the same powder particles.  This to me is 
> a effective means to create turbulence.
>
> My approach to creating turbulence is to take advantage of the 
> themosiphon "Chimney"effect.  Hot gas flows up and is cooled and then gets 
> pulled along an alternate tube back to the bottom where the spark plug is.  I 
> calculated the gas flow in the order of 137m/s within my reactor.  Whether 
> this figure is accurate or not, one thing is clear - I have sufficient 
> turbulence.
>
> It appears unneccesary to use spark plug for temperature measurements.  There 
> appears to be an abundance of thermocouple connections in that reactor.  
> Looking at the reactor end plates, there are a lot of "holes" for a bunch of 
> different instrument probes.  The presence of the spark plug is unneccesary 
> for the purposes you mentioned.
>
> To me, sparks appear to be critical for the creation of Rydberg matter as 
> speculated by Axil.
>
> I am unfamiliar with the Atomic Battery calculations you are alluding to.  
> Can you please elaborate?
>
> Jojo
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From:David Roberson
>> To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 1:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>> Technologies
>>
>> I do see the two plugs at opposite ends of the device but it is not obvious 
>> why this configuration would generate a large amount turbulence.  The fact 
>> that they are using two plugs might indicate that there are two isolated 
>> voltage feeds; one positive and the other negative (or AC to balance the 
>> effect).   This might tend to spread the ion stream along the length of the 
>> cylinder.
>>
>> The metal caps at each end of the device are quite thick which explains the 
>> long reach plugs.
>>
>> An earlier poster suggested that the plugs were merely used as a means of 
>> breaching the metal caps with a high pressure and temperature resistant 
>> connector.  This might be the reason for the plugs if we follow their 
>> reasoning since spark plugs are used in ICE in that manner.  Of course they 
>> also carry the high voltage to activate the plugs in those services.
>>
>> There may be good logic associated with the spark induced ion current 
>> injection.  I once looked at that from a different perspective.  I 
>> calculated the induced current associated with an atomic battery that 
>> operated with beta plus decays that would occur according to Rossi's 
>> original paper.  It was a while back in time but I recall that several 
>> milliamps of current would be induced at the power level of a few 
>> kilowatts.  I can reproduce the number if it is of additional interest.
>>
>> If the current is in the form of protons required to interact then it should 
>> not be too difficult to generate the necessary number by spark ionization.  
>> I have to wonder how effeciently the protons interact with the nickel active 
>> regions when origniated in this manner.
>>
>> I note that you mention that you use a different method of creating 
>> turbulence in your device.  Have you actually build one which has a 
>> significant energy gain?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Thu, May 10, 2012 11:31 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>> Technologies
>>
>> Another thing, notice on page 24, DGT's reactor has 2 spark plugs mounted 
>> co-axially on both ends of the reactor.
>>
>> What is the point of this?  What is the point of 2 plugs on both ends?  
>> Seems to me that if you wanted more power, all you've got to do is increase 
>> the energy on each individual spark and use only one spark plug.
>>
>> I speculate that this is for the purpose of creating turbulent flow.  DGT 
>> must be firing those plugs alternately, created a rhythm of heating and 
>> cooling on both ends of the reactor thereby stimulating turbulent mixing in 
>> the reactor.  Seems logical for me.
>>
>> I used a different approach in stimulating turbulence.
>>
>> Jojo
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From:Jojo Jaro
>>> To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 11:20 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>>> Technologies
>>>
>>> Rossi has not mentioned anything about spark plugs, though I suspect that 
>>> sparks being central to his design, he would misdirect about it.  I am of 
>>> the opinion that those things that are mentioned by Rossi are the wrong 
>>> ideas, while those things that he is curiously silent about are the key.  A 
>>> basic assumption I am working from is that Rossi would misdirect, while DGT 
>>> would be more candid.  So far, that assumption appears to hold.  I believe 
>>> Rossi calls his high voltage sparks as "RF".
>>>
>>> I've always wondered about the amount of electronics in Rossi's blue box.  
>>> Seems to me that if you only wanted to control power to a resistance 
>>> heater, you won't need that tangled web of electronics we saw in his blue 
>>> box.  Those electronics are for some process totalling unrelated to his 
>>> resistance heating, IMO.
>>>
>>> Remember one of those videos by Matts Lewan.  Krivit rightly mentioned that 
>>> before Lewan entered the room where the steam output was, there appears to 
>>> be no steam popping noise.  When Lewan entered the room, the steam 
>>> immediately started popping.  When Lewan went back, he caught Rossi red 
>>> handed with his hands at the controls manipulating something.  I speculate 
>>> that Rossi was manipulating sparks.  That's the most logical conclusion for 
>>> me as no other heating mechanism can instantaneously create lots of heat 
>>> and steam in the time it takes Lewan to enter the room (probably a few 
>>> seconds).
>>>
>>> As for your question on how to distribute the heat, you are right, but the 
>>> answer is turbulence.  In another thread, I speculated that sparking must 
>>> be accompanied by turbulence and mixing.  If not, the sparks would quickly 
>>> "cook" and melt the nickel nanostructures critical to the process.  A 
>>> design must be made that would insure that sparks do not follow the same 
>>> path everrytime, and if it does, it must not pass through the same set of 
>>> nickel powder particles.  Hence, turbulence is key.
>>>
>>> I have designed my reactor to achieve both these goals.  I believe for me, 
>>> it is now just a matter of hunting for that secret ingredient.  Axil's 
>>> speculation about Cesium being the secret ingredient is quite compelling.
>>>
>>> Jojo
>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From:David Roberson
>>>> To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:55 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>>>> Technologies
>>>>
>>>> Jojo, I do not recall any evidence of a spark plug or similar device in 
>>>> Rossi's designs.  It is true that the internal heating unit was well 
>>>> concealed and not subject to inspection during his first small cylindrical 
>>>> design.  Also, I suspect that it would be possible to carefully construct 
>>>> a small spark gap that could be driven by the PWM controller that he used 
>>>> for these tests.  Perhaps that is his secret sauce.
>>>>
>>>> Do you recall any evidence from his statements that suggests the use of 
>>>> sparks for the purpose you mentioned?  I can not remember any mention 
>>>> whatsoever of this process in any of his correspondences.  We will only 
>>>> know for sure when we actually get our hands upon some of his products.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that Rossi is having trouble with control of his devices because 
>>>> he depends upon temperature as the main driving force behind the energy 
>>>> production.  DGT may have discovered the spark process with one stroke of 
>>>> genius and that is why they are doing so well with their development.
>>>>
>>>> Your thoughts about the rapid heating and cooling due to sparks within the 
>>>> hydrogen are interesting.  I would be concerned that the local heating due 
>>>> to this effect would be excessive as in a hydrogen torch and would degrade 
>>>> the nickel by melting.  How would you distribute the heating so as to 
>>>> alleviate this issue?
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com>
>>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>>> Sent: Thu, May 10, 2012 9:54 pm
>>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>>>> Technologies
>>>>
>>>> Dave, I disagree.  I think the use of High Voltage Sparks is fundamental 
>>>> in both Rossi's Ecat and the DGT Hyperions.  I believe it is the best way 
>>>> to create Ionized Hydrogen for the process.
>>>>
>>>> I suspect the bulk heater is used to bring the temps up and then use the 
>>>> Sparks to control the reaction by controlling the amount of Ionized 
>>>> hydrogen available for the process.
>>>>
>>>> In a previous thread, (I believe it was "To spark or not to spark")  I 
>>>> speculated that spikes in temperature were the result of sparks, as no 
>>>> other process could bring hydrogen temps up that quickly and cooling it 
>>>> down just as quickly.  Looks like my initial suspicions were correct.  
>>>> Sparks are the Ke, together with the "secret sauce".
>>>>
>>>> Funny, how DGT uses that "long reach" spark plug (looks like a Champion 1" 
>>>> long reach spark plug.); same thing that I have used in my spark reactor; 
>>>> albeit used in a slightly different manner.
>>>>
>>>> Jojo
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From:David Roberson
>>>>> To:vortex-l@eskimo.com
>>>>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 8:59 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:"Progress Photographs" pdf from Defkalion Green 
>>>>> Technologies
>>>>>
>>>>> This technique looks significantly different from anything that Rossi has 
>>>>> demonstrated.
>>>>> Dave

Reply via email to