I must not understand the hydrino concept very well Robin. I thought that the hydrinos formed by releasing energy into some other catalyst. Is this in error?
Why do you mention a cost of 4000 eV per hydrino? How is that number derived? Dave -----Original Message----- From: mixent <mix...@bigpond.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 2:01 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management (and LENR)) In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 13:40:47 +0800: i, snip] Have you come up with a way to produce these hydrinos cheaply (in terms of energy.)? It seems to me that the first step is to prove your theory with a relatively cheap "Hydrino Generator". I guess once you are able to create copious amounts of hydrinos, it would be a simple thing to produce power, whether there is actual Fusion or not; did I understand you correctly? All one and the same thing. Hydrinos are manufactured in the device itself, and used on the spot. owever the great possible weakness is that I'm not sure how much energy it will ost to make them. At 100% production efficiency about 4000 eV / Hydrino => 8 eV fusion energy for a COP of 2000. However I have no idea what sort of roduction efficiency I might achieve in practice (IOW I don't know how many imes I will have to spend 4000 eV to produce 1 Hydrino). hough it may not be too bad, as there are few alternative routes available that ight consume energy. Despite the uncertainties, I think it's worth trying. The downside is a few housand down the drain if it doesn't work. The upside is billion/trillions if t does. The World spends over 4 trillion annually on energy). (Besides the additional benefit of cheap & easy interplanetary travel.;) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
