How could the velocity distribution of those virtual particles be determined?
David On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:58 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>wrote: > Polarizable vacuum analysis of electric and magnetic fields**** > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.1305.pdf**** > > ** ** > > ------------------**** > > ABSTRACT**** > > In summary, according to the analysis of the energy and force of the > electric and magnetic fields on the basis of vacuum polarization, it is > concluded that an electric field is a polarized distribution of the vacuum > virtual dipoles, and that a magnetic field in vacuum is a rearrangement of > the vacuum polarization. Thus, the electromagnetic wave can be**** > > regarded as a successional changing of the vacuum polarization in space. > Also, it is found that the virtual dipoles around an elementary charge > possess an average half length**** > > a = 2.8 × 10^−15 m. **** > > This result leads to the knowledge that an electric field has a step > distribution of the energy density, which eliminated the divergence in > calculating the electron’s electrostatic energy. And it is known that there > is a relation between the fine structure constant and the vacuum > polarization distribution, which reduced the mystery of the constant α. > Finally, it is figured out that an extremely high energy density of the > electromagnetic field can be ∼ 10^29 J/m^3, which implies an optical > power density ∼ 10^33 W/cm^2;**** > > far higher than the Schwinger critical value. With these interesting > findings, we anticipate that the vacuum polarization investigation of the > fields will be developed further and applied to more fundamental problems > of physics.**** > > ---------------------------------**** > > ** ** > > Some of you will remember how I’ve expressed my thoughts on a qualitative > model I’ve been developing which is based on a physical model of the vacuum > and its properties and behavior which results in the things that we > perceive to be subatomic particles/atoms. Remember how I regretted not > having the mathematical skills necessary to quantify my qualitative model? > Well, it would seem that this person has beat me to it! His description of > the propagation of an EM wave a “…successional changing of the vacuum > polarization in space” is exactly how I envision it. I hope this scientist > continues to develop his ideas, and gets some help from other bright minds… > I’d like to see where this path might lead!**** > > ** ** > > -Mark**** > > ** ** >
