Guenter,
I am closer to Laughlin’s camp than Axisl’s or Thom
Prevenslik’s but after many long communications with Thomas it became clear
that, IMHO, the differences are far more semantic than most people realize… if
you say the ether is unphysical I will agree totally because we are 3d
physical beings unable to perceive or even verbalize “matter” if it does not
exist in “our” plane – where our 3D plane is an absurdly thin ribbon that
particles from this other dimension suddenly emerge into from the future, grow
to full size in the Present and then shrink into the past..note my use of
temporal direction as opposed to spatial since the ether has no spatial bias
and just like time is perpendicular to 3d space. The rate at which these
virtual particles pass through our plane will always appear to be C from our
local perspective whether we are in a spaceship travelling at .9C and
experiencing time dilation slow relative to earth normal or if we are a tiny
observer inside a Casimir cavity where we experience time dilation fast
relative to earth normal. This would also explain why the M&M experiment fails
to uncover any spatial bias to the ether since the direction of the ether is
perpendicular to all 3 spatial axis. I vaguely recall a comment made by Bohr on
this same argument between 2 of his famous peers [I don’t recall which] but the
upshot of the comment was that these seemingly opposing theories of whether the
ether medium is populated really aren’t. Instead of a sea of nonphysical
virtual particles one might consider a many body interaction where some gas
atoms are time dilated and get much older [catalyzed?] how does this effect
conservation of momentum –note we don’t care if the time stream is occupied by
virtual particles or is an absolute vacuum – the results – time dilation are
the same and my question is the “direction” of those time dilated atoms …does
the Casimir geometry which appears to approach 2D from our perspective allow us
to unbalance the conservation of momentum? I know DiFiore et all were studying
this in Italy with respect to possible gravity modification but my position has
always been that Casimir effect is actually a segregation where the suppressed
area inside the cavity is exactly balanced by a shallow larger area of
compressed area outside the plates – so I wasn’t surprised they failed to
measure any weight modification.. similarly I think Mills and Rossi need to
introduce gas molecules in a biased manner or simply exploit a geometrical
preference of the gas atoms to occupy one type of a region preferentially over
the other so the segregated effects don’t cancel. The tritium and other
radioactive gas decay anomalies would then be just a matter of which areas
inside a segregated Casimir geometry they prefer to occupy.
OK
I rambled on enough
Fran
From: Guenter Wildgruber [mailto:gwildgru...@ymail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:FYI: THz pulses can drive lattice vibrations
directly...
fran,
thank you for Your kind and moderate words.
Actually my thinking and arguing in the list here is centered about the
possibility that Rossi eventually might use THz.
About other aspects I do not know a lot.
Wrt Rossi my comment is a resolute NO, with very basic arguments, technological
and commercial/cost-related.
Mark has been very upset about my argument, which I do not understand.
ZPE is not on my radar, I must confess. I am waiting for a blip of evidence,
not Sterling Allan type.
The Casimir-effect is a tiny effect, which eventually could turn our
understanding of all-that-is completely around.
One interesting person I encountered was Robert Laughlin, the Nobel-Price
winner, who argued that 'vacuum' actually is dense, like glass.
But he seems to be a lonely voice, and the pity is, I do not understand that.
All the best
Guenter
________________________________
V ison: francis <froarty...@comcast.net<mailto:froarty...@comcast.net>>
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Gesendet: 14:19 Freitag, 27.Juli 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:FYI: THz pulses can drive lattice vibrations directly...
Guenter,
We certainly don’t think anyone is “intentionally” creating
efficent THZ pulses but there is a very difficult to reproduce anomaly in play
which is why we historically vet suggestions like Mark’s with an open mind… we
have slowly and painfully tried to fit different puzzle pieces into place only
to find none of the traditional pieces fit – this site is dedicated to
considering the more exotic possibilities when traditional explanations just
don’t work. If you have read any of my posts you know I advocate a Puthoff like
atomic model and share his opinions regarding vacuum engineering with a pinch
of Jan Naudts relativistic explanation for hydrogen in a lattice being
“equivalent” to hydrogen expelled from the suns corona at relativistic speed
[without the need for high velocity spatial displacement – It is these
relativistic anomalies created by the tubules or nano geometry that lend
support to Mark’s suggestion as frequencies are up and down converted by direct
manipulation of space-time via suppression / Casimir geometries. We know that
many of these claims rest upon different methods of agitation that all seem to
have properties that result in changing the geometry…when you are talking
changes in distance based on 1/a^4 you can create huge swings in the Casimir
value [dynamic Casimir effect ?] with very little energy –my pet theory being
it discounts the amount of energy needed to disassociate any h2 to the point
where more energy is released upon the reassociation at the new Casimir value
than it takes in heat energy to cause the disassociation –harnessing this
change in pressure when the motive force opposing the change in value is the
random motion of gas [hup] would be a valid method to extract ZPE.
Regards
Fran
Bottom of Form
Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:18:04 -0700
guys, whatever that is, do You really think that Rossi put something like that
into real world commercial operation?
THz pulses with significant energy?
on a partial cost basis of say $100 of his ecat-3.
Sorry to say: You must be completely deluded and have not idea what technology
is all about.
Did you ever build something slightly sophisticated?
If not, shut up and retreat to your cave or listen to people who did.
Citing something exotic does not make it operational,
Daily techno-gossip is full of crap like this.
GET REAL!
Very annoyed.
Plus: Dear Lou. If You cite crappy points from dkos, please elaborate.
I have no problem if You attack me directly.
I will respond accordingly.
Please be warned!
Guenter
