Well, I guess time will tell as to how critical the angles will be. I picture the effect as being of a low probability nature where a small modification to the angle of motion for the protons allows the target to be hit. This thought is based upon the incredibly tiny cross section area of the target nucleus. Think of it as a poke into the dark at a small target, where the modified magnetic field changes the direction of the poke slightly.
Of course you may be correct in your assessment, and one day we will know the proper answers. Now, what were the questions? :-) Dave -----Original Message----- From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Aug 9, 2012 8:22 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012 Dave: I don’t think it’s going to be some oblique angle either… it’ll likely be some multiple of 90degs; or ‘half a pi’ if you prefer your physics served up that way! ;-) bon appétit! -m From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:10 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012 DaveR, I got sidetracked with my posting on genies and all, kind of feeling a bit ‘hi’ today!, and forgot that I wanted to respond to your comment about mag-flds… absolutely they will be important because they affect the geometries/alignments. Possibly also alternating E and B flds… By definition, the atoms in a metal lattice are already aligned, but being able to tweak that alignment to some degree could very well be a key requirement… -mark From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 4:16 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion GT at NIWeek2012 DGT mentioned that the reacting hydrogen electron was in the vicinity of the proton and nickel atom for a short time period during which the fusion occurred. Does this match quantum physics theory? I thought that there is no way to locate an electron at a particular time and that it is everywhere within its orbital all of the time. Perhaps they are adding support to classical physics in their description. The other possibility is that they really do not understand the mechanism. I bet on the later. It is interesting to see that DGT suggests that a magnetic field is important for the device operation just as I have suspected. Dave
