So, you admit to having NOT read CE web site and a more thorough explanation
of his theory. So, you do not really understand what his theory is;
YET, you mouth off as if you're the expert. Your verbal diarrhea is full of
irrelevancy and useless comments that make you feel you know it know.
Shallow waters are indeed noisy.
You know, you may learn a little insight and wisdom if you heed the
following ancient (and modern) wisdom.
"He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto
him." - Solomon
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." -Albert
Einstein
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof
against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting
ignorance - that principle is contempt prior to investigation". - Herbert
Spencer
You claim to be a man of science and yet you act like the quintessential
bigot. The audacity you carry and use to condemn a new idea is
mind-boggling.
Are we supposed to be impressed that you "studied Physics under Feynman"?
Yes, I am impressed with Feynman, but am I supposed to be impressed by you?
Tell us, do you even have a Physics degree; undergraduate or otherwise?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Theory Panel Dissensus
At 10:37 AM 8/16/2012, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
RE: ChemEng's hypothesis,
Abd,
at least he backs up his hypothesis with a list of references... all
*191*
of them! So he is probably MORE current on the scientific underpinnings
of
his hypothesis than you, so I'd suggest you visit his website and read his
well-referenced explanation BEFORE commenting on it, else you'll just look
like an arrogant know-it-all... oh, too late.
I don't know beans about his hypothesis, only that he's been having a lot
of fun with it. Gremlins. I actually think it's a great name. Some LENR
researchers were not amused.
What I write is generally most useful -- or most entertaining -- for by
people who have some detachment, who aren't stuck on "right" and "wrong"
and other fantasies. I've assumed that Chemical Engineer is in that
category.
I'm not at all motivated to read the web site at this point. If Chemical
Engineer asks me some specific question about it, that would be another
matter.
Of course I'm an arrogant know-it-all. Or, since I *don't* know it all,
perhaps I'm merely arrogant. Comes with the territory, my story is that if
you had the childhood I had, you'd be arrogant, too. Of course, it's just
a story. I made it up. The test scores I did not make up.
