Good calorimetry is difficult, but comparisons are not. Wouldn't it be sufficient to demonstrate two parallel implementations, one with an unprocessed CONSTANTAN wire and no H2, one with a processed wire and H2, and measure the difference using the same approach?
Why do I even have to pose this question? Questions like this are what cause the rest of the world to doubt the whole discipline. How hard is this? What am I missing? Help me out here. Jeff On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > ** ** > > *From:* Robert Lynn **** > > ** ** > > [snip] Add that 25.2 to the 36.7 and subtract 48 input and you get 14W > excess…. I think you can pretty confidently state that it is over 10W.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Nice work. Thanks. **** > > ** ** > > Is there any way to guesstimate – assuming the best reasonable kind of > insulation is added to retain heat, something like aerogel, etc – how much > more mass of active wire (if any) would be necessary to get close to a > nominally self-sustaining system?**** > > ** ** > > Jones**** >
