Actually, ultimately science is a very small part of this story if LENR 
verifies.

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 22, 2012, at 6:04 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> When the cold fusion research community finally comes up with devices meeting 
> your criteria, the world will be grateful to you Mr. Gibbs.  Because of your 
> strong stand for serious scientific proof, in the end, science will win 
> because of your steadfastness.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Mark Gibbs <mgi...@gibbs.com> wrote:
> In the piece by Hank Mills it claims "PESN has obtained satisfactory 
> confirmation that a report covering the test does indeed exist." ... the 
> article then goes on to completely avoid any details as to what the 
> "satisfactory confirmation" might be or who might consider it satisfactory.
> 
> The piece concludes with "<If> the test reports that are expected to be 
> released at Zurich and then in October show evidence of the above, they are 
> worth waiting for." Sure, and if the tests reveal that unicorns are real that 
> would also be worth waiting for. 
> 
> Hank Mills continues: "I would go further; <if> they show kilowatts of excess 
> heat and temperatures of up to 1,200C, the wait will have been trivial."
> 
> If, if, if ... 
> 
> As my grandmother used to say: "If wishes were horses, beggars would ride."
> 
> [Mark Gibbs]
> 
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sterling Allan 
> <sterlin...@pureenergysystems.com> wrote:
> We could have published this much sooner, but with all of the negativity 
> going around presently about Rossi, I thought it deserved a story by itself.
> 
> http://pesn.com/2012/08/22/9602166_Existence_of_1200_C_E-Cat_Test_Report_Confirmed/
>  
> 
> Featured / Best Exotic FE: Nuclear > Cold Fusion > Rossi > 
> Existence of 1,200C E-Cat Test Report Confirmed - PESN has obtained 
> confirmation that a report about a third-party test of an E-Cat module, 
> reaching 1,200 degrees Celsius, does indeed exist. We're not a liberty to say 
> more than that, so don't ask. (PESN; August 22, 2012)
> 

Reply via email to