Thanks Stewart,
Yes, I have been saying the same thing for quite a while. Miley showed a long time ago that is was the fission of a compound nucleus. Many nucleons acting as one. How can that be? The nucleus are of Fermi meter dimensions and the inter nuclear spacing is in angstroms? Once again the only way is if the range of the strong nuclear force is extended. My analysis suggests that the spin orbit nuclear-magnetic effect is the actor. I am an Electrical Engineer and I think in terms of fields and forces. Nuclear physicists think in therms of particle like nucleons. I know the magnetic force is not conserved. The spin orbit force must by analogy also be non-conservative. The magnetic field is extend within soft iron. I believe that the nuclear spin orbit force is extended within a vibrating inverse Bose condensate. A condensate of protons. For some reason over the last few days my book has started selling. The article on IE produced no sales. I know not why. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&field-author=Frank%20Znidarsic&ie=UTF8&search-alias=books&sort=relevancerank The mathematics also produced the quantum condition and a unification of Special Relativity and quantum physics. I completed this stuff 10 years ago and adjusted a little since. My experiments have not produced any anomalous energy by I will soon try again with something different. http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/913/Frank,%20Znidarsic%20(new) Frank Znidarsic Interestingly, I came across an article from around the year 2000 or so that mentioned Jed and also mentioned Frank Z. telling Ed Storms he thought there was a link between cold fusion, superconductivity and gravity. I think Frank was right and Ed is still looking primarily at a nuclear fusion reaction. Sometimes I think scientists seem so bent on one theory that fits their discipline that they close their eyes to others. Just the way I see it. Stewart -----Original Message----- From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 8:22 pm Subject: [Vo]:ECAT Simulations With Third Order Temperature Dependency Terry, That is a good paper that I need to reference. I see it more like alot of different research/results are pointing us in a common direction. I am trying to piece together alot of observations and other theories, some from astro physics and some from nuclear physics and some from just plain old engineering sense & logic. Unexpectedly, I have also scared myself a bit by what I think the reaction might be, what it implies and how to make it safe when you scale it up. There is a reason that it is taking taking decades to produce a device that is stable. Many very smart people have built devices that worked at one time and yet they were not able to make it to market. I also see some health issues that concern me with some of the people most involved in the past. Interestingly, I came across an article from around the year 2000 or so that mentioned Jed and also mentioned Frank Z. telling Ed Storms he thought there was a link between cold fusion, superconductivity and gravity. I think Frank was right and Ed is still looking primarily at a nuclear fusion reaction. Sometimes I think scientists seem so bent on one theory that fits their discipline that they close their eyes to others. Just the way I see it. Stewart On Thursday, August 30, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:41 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Those are pretty tough questions for a device that is generating fission, > fusion, chemical and possibly some forms of collapsed matter, all with > different reaction kinetics, time constants and instabilities... Someone is beating you to the draw: http://www.darksideofgravity.com/DG_neutrinos.pdf T
