When I see/read something like the following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosenova
I think that the magnetic fields created across a void/gap due to charge concentrations must align the condensate atoms such that the repulsion between atoms within the condensate is reduced further allowing quantum gravity to then trigger a collapse and instant, intense radiation and heat release. I think the effect is most likely enhanced by external pressure/repulsion from the lattice on the condensate, ultra high densities and total charge accumulation. I am a chemical guy so think less about magnetic fields but that seems to an important parameter. Based on that Papp engine and terrawatt engines I think a lattice is optional, magnetic field induced across a metallic gap definitely. Stewart On Thursday, August 30, 2012, wrote: > Thanks Stewart, > > Yes, I have been saying the same thing for quite a while. Miley showed > a long time ago that is was the fission of a compound nucleus. > Many nucleons acting as one. How can that be? The nucleus are of Fermi > meter dimensions and the inter nuclear spacing is in angstroms? > > Once again the only way is if the range of the strong nuclear force is > extended. My analysis suggests that the spin orbit nuclear-magnetic effect > is the actor. I am an Electrical Engineer and I think in terms of fields > and forces. Nuclear physicists think in therms of particle like nucleons. > I know the magnetic force is not conserved. The spin orbit force must by > analogy also be non-conservative. The magnetic field is extend within soft > iron. I believe that the nuclear spin orbit force is extended within a > vibrating inverse Bose condensate. A condensate of protons. For some > reason over the last few days my book has started selling. The article on > IE produced no sales. I know not why. > > > http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&field-author=Frank%20Znidarsic&ie=UTF8&search-alias=books&sort=relevancerank > > > The mathematics also produced the quantum condition and a unification of > Special Relativity and quantum physics. > I completed this stuff 10 years ago and adjusted a little since. My > experiments have not produced any anomalous energy by I will soon try again > with something different. > > > http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/913/Frank,%20Znidarsic%20(new) > > > > Frank Znidarsic > > > > > Interestingly, I came across an article from around the year 2000 or so > that mentioned Jed and also mentioned Frank Z. telling Ed Storms he thought > there was a link between cold fusion, superconductivity and gravity. I > think Frank was right and Ed is still looking primarily at a nuclear fusion > reaction. > > Sometimes I think scientists seem so bent on one theory that fits their > discipline that they close their eyes to others. > > Just the way I see it. > > Stewart > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'cheme...@gmail.com');>> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'vortex-l@eskimo.com');>> > Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2012 8:22 pm > Subject: [Vo]:ECAT Simulations With Third Order Temperature Dependency > > Terry, > > That is a good paper that I need to reference. I see it more like alot > of different research/results are pointing us in a common direction. I am > trying to piece together alot of observations and other theories, some from > astro physics and some from nuclear physics and some from just plain old > engineering sense & logic. > > Unexpectedly, I have also scared myself a bit by what I think the > reaction might be, what it implies and how to make it safe when you scale > it up. There is a reason that it is taking taking decades to produce a > device that is stable. Many very smart people have built devices that > worked at one time and yet they were not able to make it to market. I also > see some health issues that concern me with some of the people most > involved in the past. > > Interestingly, I came across an article from around the year 2000 or so > that mentioned Jed and also mentioned Frank Z. telling Ed Storms he thought > there was a link between cold fusion, superconductivity and gravity. I > think Frank was right and Ed is still looking primarily at a nuclear fusion > reaction. > > Sometimes I think scientists seem so bent on one theory that fits their > discipline that they close their eyes to others. > > Just the way I see it. > > Stewart > > > On Thursday, August 30, 2012, Terry Blanton wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:41 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Those are pretty tough questions for a device that is generating >> fission, >> > fusion, chemical and possibly some forms of collapsed matter, all with >> > different reaction kinetics, time constants and instabilities... >> >> Someone is beating you to the draw: >> >> http://www.darksideofgravity.com/DG_neutrinos.pdf >> >> T >> >>
