At 05:03 AM 9/15/2012, Sverre Haslund wrote:
Hmm.. my edit about SGS certificate has held for
10
minutes.Â
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plans>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer#Commercial_plansÂ
Sverre Haslund
Eek.
Page history shows revert warring See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:3RR#The_three-revert_rule.
It's a bit tedious to figure this out exactly, but it looks like:
TheNextFuture, 5RR. I predict a block any day for
TheNextFuture. This is an SPA, likely the sock of
a banned user. New users don't file AfDs in their
first few edits. Once upon a time, there would
have been somone all over TheNextFuture, like me.
Insilvis, 5RR. block for revert warring likely.
"Good reverts" is generally not a defense.
Shaslund, 2RR. SPA, only five edits total, one
edit in 2009 to Blacklight Power. Block not
likely unless Sverre pushes this further.
Shaslund is clearly not an experienced user,
doesn't use edit summaries (very important when reverting, to explain).
Given the insistent activity from editors (on
both sides) clearly not following WP policy and
guidelines, I predict that the article will be
protected from editing. Semiprotection might not
be adequate here. With less than this, and really
only one revert warrior, Cold fusion was
full-protected. All it takes is someone who knows how to file an RfPP.
In any case, Shaslund's first attempt to insert
the material lasted 53 minutes before being
reverted by Insilvis. The second lasted 24
minutes. A third might get him blocked, a fourth
would very, very likely result in a block if it's within 24 hours.
The 3RR rule is a "bright line," one must have a
critical interest to cross it and survive, and an
admin might block first and ask questions later.
Something like illegal content or libel. I once
survived a 3RR violation block because I was
reverting blatant sock puppets. First entry in my
block log.... reversed as soon as the admin took a closer look. I was new.
Insilivis might make that claim here, TheNextFuture is so obvious.