When electricity is out city-wide, it becomes real convincing real quick.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:06 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > I would bet that a demonstration of a charger would not convince many > about the reality of CF devices. So many would suggest ways that the > effect could be faked or scammed just as we have seen before. I think > Rossi has the best idea when he says that the market place can make the > final determination. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Esa Ruoho <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 7:08 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:We should employ new methods of persuading the public > > The first person who goes around during a Sandy#2 and charges people's > laptops and mobile phones with a portable CF-device is going to do a lot > more to convince people it's a "everyday useful energy-source" than any > amount of comments on SciAm or elsewhere. > > People want a real-life useful thing. I've tried to tell many about Free > Energy devices, and they're always like: "Well, can I power my stove with > it?", which is a valid question from a real-life use point-of-view. A > question without an answer, unfortunately. > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Mark Gibbs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> "there is no hope to convince people until there is a working prototype >> that we can put on the client table, and that clearly work, even roughly." >> I could have sworn that was what I've been writing on and off for the >> last year or so! >> No one but scientists care if CF exists but isn't useful in the >> everyday world. The endless theories about how CF might work are, in >> practical terms, unimportant. If CF is shown to be useful, everything >> changes. >> All that is required is for someone or some company to fire up a CF >> device that has some measurable useful energy output and leave it running >> for long enough to convince everyone it's real -- that would be the kind of >> fact that I think Peter's referring to that would counter the"anti-CF >> memes." >> >
