On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote:
> At 05:06 PM 12/20/2012, James Bowery wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <<mailto: >> a...@lomaxdesign.com>a**b...@lomaxdesign.com <a...@lomaxdesign.com>> wrote: >> >> James Bowery <<http://www.mail-archive.com/** >> search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&**q=from:%22James+Bowery%22<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=from:%22James+Bowery%22> >> >http**://www.mail-archive.com/**search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&** >> q=from:%22James+Bowery%22<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=from:%22James+Bowery%22>> >> Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:07:16 -0800 <<http://www.mail-archive.com/** >> search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&**q=date:20121219<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:20121219> >> >http://www.**mail-archive.com/search?l=**vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:** >> 20121219<http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.com&q=date:20121219> >> > >> >> >> Perhaps what is so difficult for the Vortex "lame brains" is not >> deciphering the "Mole" comment, but figuring out why "Lucky Saint" has not >> provided a video of this LENR disk boiling water. >> >> >> >> One could easily fake this in a video, it would be trivial. It could be >> done with, indeed, induction heating of the copper, that could be invisible >> on the video, and *anything* can be faked in a video. But this could be >> extremely difficult to fake with an in-person demonstration, where >> observers could check everything -- except, to preserve "privacy" -- i.e., >> intellectual rights, if those matter -- the contents of the copper cell. >> >> >> Induction heating would require a visible device nearby. If "Lucky >> Saint" is sincerely attempting to help the world by releasing this >> technology, as he has presumably attempted by disclosing the fabrication >> technique, then it would be a small additional effort to post a video of a >> beaker of water containing the boiling device, with the beaker elevated on >> some sort of stand that would not plausibly contain an induction heater. >> >> Faking that video would be difficult enough to motivate a "Russ" type of >> fellow, who has access to the requisite resources, to proceed to replicate >> the recipe. >> > > Aw, c'mon. That level of fake would be trivial. Sure, the video might be > made so that it would be difficult. But it would still be quite possible > with video editing software. > > Look, it's a lot of work to replicate something like this. I would *not* > invest that work unless: > You aren't a "Russ" kind of guy, though, are you? He's put quite a bit of work into replicating the Papp piston all with even less direct information about how to build one. Am I advising people to go out and build this device based on the current or even the proposed video "evidence"?
