Yes, I stand corrected.
If calling for the open, transparent and proper accountability of his
qualifications is an insult, then yes, I've insulted Obama.
If calling for the proper transparency and objectivity from Darwinian
Evolutionist is an insult, then yes, I've insulted them (Notice how Lomax
clouds the issue. My problem is with Darwinian Evolutionists, not
Evolutionary Biogists. This is the crux of the issue. Everyone is lulled
into the belief that evolution automatically mean Darwinian Evolution. It
does not. I happen to believe in evolution also. I believe in
microevolution because I can see it with my own eyes. I haven't seen a
turtle turn into a bird. LOL...)
If telling the truth about muhammed and his practice of dozens of wives and
concubines is an insult, then yes, I've insulted him. (It's your problem if
you find the truth about your prophet offensive.)
Not sure how I could have insulted A'isha.
I have not insulted Abraham and Sarah. I pointed out that what they did was
wrong. Even the Angel that promised Sarah a son corrected Abraham in this
matter saying that the son you born with Haggar (Sarah's maid) will not
inherit Abraham's wealth. He put aside the illegitimate child (Ishmael) in
favor for the promised child (Isaac). I understand muslims find this
offensive because they (modern muslim arabs) predominantly descended from
the lineage of Ishmael, so they like to claim first born preferencial
kinship to Abraham, but that is in fact not what the Bible said. Isaac was
to be the one in favor over Ishmael. Ishmael was to be sent away.
If muslims find the truth about their god and prophet an insult, then yes, I
have insulted muslims by saying their god is the moon god of muhammed's
tribe and muhammed had dozens of wives and concubines and had a 9 year old
sex toy. All of which is the truth. So, muslims find the truth offensive.
Interesting.
Which Hawaiian State Registrar are you referring to? Name please? Are you
implying that he or she has seen the original Birth Certificate. If so, I'd
be curious if he said that the scanned copy he saw on the Internet is the
same as the vault copy. As far as I know, no state official has actually
said that the BC on the Internet was accurate. All they said was that they
have the oriignal copy of Obama's BC under vault. They never mentioned
anything about what it contained. Everyone was too afraid to cross the
Illuminati.
But other than these people that I have "insulted", have I actually insulted
anyone in Vortex-l first without being insulted first?
Jojo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Abd ul-Rahman Lomax" <a...@lomaxdesign.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>; <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:List integrity
At 09:29 PM 12/29/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote:
... my caustic postings are exclusively directed at people who insult me;
I challenged anyone to sieve thru the archives to see if I have insulted
people who have not insulted me.
Barack Obama. Evolutionary biologists. Muhammad. His wife, Ayesha. Abraham
and his wife Sarah. Every Muslim on the planet. (That's, what, one out of
four people?) I could add, for example, the Hawaiian State Registrar, who
apparently does not exist in Jojo's eyes, or is lying.
Qutie obviously, Bill has examined the situation in Vortex-L and has seen
that what I am doing here does not deserve banning like many of these
trolls would like to advocate. But if he does ban me due to mob pressure,
I will still not change my response to obvious bullies.
I doubt very much that Bill has looked at the situation. Bill will not
respond to "mob pressure," I'm sure.
I have not advocated banning Jojo. I've advocated warning him.
