Sorry I am confused. What is considered false here? A nine year old is barely out diapers
or that muslims do not disapprove of sexual relations with a nine year old? Harry On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49 AM, de Bivort Lawrence <ldebiv...@gmail.com> wrote: > That a statement is endlessly repeated does not make it true. > > I posted at length on the family practices of the Arabian peninsula, as they > pertained to Christian, Jewish, and pantheistic communities, and to the > pre-revelatory emergence of Islam, which limited some of the practices that > many people today criticize. > > But Jojo seems not to have seen this posting, though he did say he would > respond to it (and this I hope from his own knowledge rather than > assertian-based pseudo-sources), for he repeats assertions that are shown in > the posting to be flat-out incorrect. > > > On Dec 31, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax >> <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote: >>> At 10:37 PM 12/30/2012, Jojo Jaro wrote: >> >>>> Hence, in you, the corruption of islam is seen by everyone. The same >>>> corruption that justifies to the world that it is OK to fondle a 9 year old >>>> little girl BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS, just because other people are doing it. >>>> No matter how you justify it, that's CREEPY. >>> >>> >>> BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. BARELY OUT OF DIAPERS. What is >>> obviously false does not become more true by being repeated over and over. >>> Jojo actually acknowledged that this one was false, but has continued to >>> emphasize it. >> >> >> Jojo is using hyperbole so calling it false is an ineffective repsonse. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbole >> >> Harry >> >
